mirror of
https://github.com/fooflington/selfdefined.git
synced 2025-06-10 21:01:41 +00:00
🐛 Fixes SCSS build errors
This commit is contained in:
@ -11,11 +11,13 @@ reading:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining places men (usually without authority) in a position of default authority, and places women and gender minoritised people with authority in a position of default subordination, which reinforces the power differential in men's favour.
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining occupies real time in meetings, leading to men gaining more air time and exposure, despite the stereotype that women speak more.[1](https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/do-women-talk-more-the-answer-is-no-but-the-belief-persists-despite-the-evidence.html)[2](https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/do-women-talk-more-the-answer-is-no-but-the-belief-persists-despite-the-evidence.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining can reinforce toxic masculinity and rape culture, as it fundamentally is about disbelieving women and gender-minoritised individuals.
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining contributes to the invalidation and disbelief of any women and gender-minoritised individuals and their credentials. The disbelief and intrinsic questioning of women and gender-minoritised individual especially reinforces systemic bias and injustice against them.
|
||||
@ -26,10 +28,10 @@ Examples include but aren't limited to: a man explaining to a woman how to prono
|
||||
|
||||
## Note
|
||||
|
||||
A good way to check if you're mansplaining is to ask yourself whether:
|
||||
A good way to check if you're mansplaining is to ask yourself whether:
|
||||
|
||||
(1) the person explicitly asked for the explanation
|
||||
|
||||
(2) you are assuming incompetence because of the person's gender, race, ability, etc, and,
|
||||
(2) you are assuming incompetence because of the person's gender, race, ability, etc, and,
|
||||
|
||||
(3) how your systematic and individual bias, particularly gender bias in this context, affects your interpretation of (1) and (2)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user