mirror of
https://github.com/fooflington/selfdefined.git
synced 2025-01-22 17:30:00 +00:00
🐛 Fixes mansplain linking issues
This commit is contained in:
parent
f9d9a1dc9e
commit
65bcdf81a6
@ -10,11 +10,13 @@ reading:
|
||||
href: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeatures/live/1600_900/images/live/p0/6f/zj/p06fzjxg.jpg
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
the act of explaining (usually by a man) something without asking consent to do so, often to someone who already knows and/or after someone else has already explained it (usually a woman or femme)
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining places men (usually without authority) in a position of default authority, and places women and gender minoritised people with authority in a position of default subordination, which reinforces the power differential in men's favour.
|
||||
|
||||
Mansplaining occupies real time in meetings, leading to men gaining more air time and exposure, despite the stereotype that women speak more.[1](https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/do-women-talk-more-the-answer-is-no-but-the-belief-persists-despite-the-evidence.html)[2](https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/do-women-talk-more-the-answer-is-no-but-the-belief-persists-despite-the-evidence.html)
|
||||
Mansplaining occupies real time in meetings, leading to men gaining more air time and exposure, despite the stereotype that women speak more.[1](https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/do-women-talk-more-the-answer-is-no-but-the-belief-persists-despite-the-evidence.html)
|
||||
|
||||
## Impact
|
||||
|
||||
@ -26,12 +28,12 @@ Someone who is repeatedly mansplained can be perceived as lacking credentials or
|
||||
|
||||
Examples include but aren't limited to: a man explaining to a woman how to pronounce her own name, explaining menstruation, or explaining the history of a country with which the woman is associated but the man has never been to.
|
||||
|
||||
## Note
|
||||
## Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
A good way to check if you're mansplaining is to ask yourself whether:
|
||||
|
||||
(1) the person explicitly asked for the explanation
|
||||
1. the person explicitly asked for the explanation
|
||||
|
||||
(2) you are assuming incompetence because of the person's gender, race, ability, etc, and,
|
||||
2. you are assuming incompetence because of the person's gender, race, ability, etc, and,
|
||||
|
||||
(3) how your systematic and individual bias, particularly gender bias in this context, affects your interpretation of (1) and (2)
|
||||
3. how your systematic and individual bias, particularly gender bias in this context, affects your interpretation of (1) and (2)
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user